Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Thomas Beierlein <tomjbe@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Fw: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-backup/bacula: bacula-5.0.2-r2.ebuild ChangeLog
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:10:44
Message-Id: 20100723141011.1571f421@ham
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Fw: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-backup/bacula: bacula-5.0.2-r2.ebuild ChangeLog by "Tomáš Chvátal"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 10:38:56 +0200
Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@g.o> wrote:
> So I will help with my 2c :P > I reworked the bacula for the purposes at my company: > http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=dev/scarabeus.git;a=blob;f=app-backup/bacula/bacula-3.0.3.ebuild > > I implemented most things people complain here, so might be really > really smart to just copy the parts. > > Cheers > > Tom
Thanks for the link Tomáš. I am sure I will do some cherry pickings :). I agree with you that we need a better set of use flags, as you did in your in-house solution. The actual set is quite a pain. Let us see how we can switch to such a new set (like yours or similar). I was thinking about an accompanying news item, but not before the next release of a new bacula version. That gives some time for preparation and a chance for thorough tests. I am still not sure why some of the old features gets dropped starting with bacula-5.0.1. I asked the former maintainer, but got no response at all. So any ideas are welcome. Thomas. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkxJhqoACgkQQe4uqXYgU9WdMwCgq20FoE1FqjlPaMYF7QmXEmHX BKoAnRH5QAzkvIzln6Mylj4Xyh8nLJp9 =5aGB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----