Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Thomas Beierlein <tomjbe@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Fw: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-backup/bacula: bacula-5.0.2-r2.ebuild ChangeLog
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:10:44
Message-Id: 20100723141011.1571f421@ham
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Fw: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-backup/bacula: bacula-5.0.2-r2.ebuild ChangeLog by "Tomáš Chvátal"
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 10:38:56 +0200
5 Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@g.o> wrote:
6 > So I will help with my 2c :P
7 > I reworked the bacula for the purposes at my company:
8 > http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=dev/scarabeus.git;a=blob;f=app-backup/bacula/bacula-3.0.3.ebuild
9 >
10 > I implemented most things people complain here, so might be really
11 > really smart to just copy the parts.
12 >
13 > Cheers
14 >
15 > Tom
16
17 Thanks for the link Tomáš. I am sure I will do some cherry
18 pickings :).
19
20 I agree with you that we need a better set of use flags, as you did in
21 your in-house solution. The actual set is quite a pain.
22
23 Let us see how we can switch to such a new set (like yours or similar).
24 I was thinking about an accompanying news item, but not before the next
25 release of a new bacula version. That gives some time for preparation
26 and a chance for thorough tests.
27
28 I am still not sure why some of the old features gets dropped starting
29 with bacula-5.0.1. I asked the former maintainer, but got no
30 response at all. So any ideas are welcome.
31
32 Thomas.
33 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
34 Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux)
35
36 iEYEARECAAYFAkxJhqoACgkQQe4uqXYgU9WdMwCgq20FoE1FqjlPaMYF7QmXEmHX
37 BKoAnRH5QAzkvIzln6Mylj4Xyh8nLJp9
38 =5aGB
39 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----