| 1 |
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 09:29:49 +0200 |
| 2 |
Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 18:24:33 +0100 |
| 4 |
> Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 19:11:33 +0200 |
| 6 |
> > hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
> > > On 06/20/2012 07:07 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 8 |
> > > > Please read the rationale. Again. The whole thing. Three times. |
| 9 |
> > > |
| 10 |
> > > Please read my suggestions. Again. The whole thing. Three times. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > Can we all agree to just stop this and just restrict the arguing to |
| 13 |
> > being between SDEPEND and DEPENDENCIES? Cheers. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> You just volunteered to write portage patches. Cheers. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Both were already implemented in Paludis, if you're looking for a |
| 18 |
reference implementation to try it out. There are also examples of |
| 19 |
use of SDEPEND in the old kdebuilds, and of DEPENDENCIES in Exherbo. I |
| 20 |
can give you a small patch to turn SDEPEND on for an EAPI if you like |
| 21 |
(it's just a one line addition to the EAPI definition file). |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives