| 1 |
On Saturday 22 January 2011 20:06:06 Sebastian Pipping wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 01/22/11 13:32, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Well, the distinction for unofficial/official overlays happen mostly in |
| 4 |
> > layman -L, I don't think users pay attention to our git repo list. |
| 5 |
> > Furthermore, I got at least three requests from developers to move their |
| 6 |
> > repo from user/ to dev/ (same problem when devs retired). This |
| 7 |
> > distinction doesn't make any sense. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Three request over what time? Compared to a screen height of user repos |
| 10 |
> created, maybe that's not much. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Sebastian |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I'm sorry I don't share your point. I think I was quite clear, the |
| 17 |
user/developer distinction (or better, the unofficial/official overlay) should |
| 18 |
happen in layman list and in overlays website, not in gitolite. Take a look at |
| 19 |
the current list in gitweb and tell me honestly how clear and distinct is that |
| 20 |
thing for you. For the record: |
| 21 |
the following overlays should move from dev/ to user/: |
| 22 |
b33fc0d3, hawking, uberlord, welp |
| 23 |
the following should move from user/ to dev/: |
| 24 |
dilfridge |
| 25 |
at least two people with user/ overlays are going to be gentoo devs soon |
| 26 |
and last but not least, smithdanea overlay is useless because c1pher has a dev |
| 27 |
overlay as well now |
| 28 |
not to mention the proj/ list. |
| 29 |
And now, imagine the state of the user/ dev/ list mess in, say, two or five |
| 30 |
years |
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap) |
| 33 |
Gentoo KDE/Qt, Planet, Overlays |
Archives