1 |
Mike Frysinger wrote: |
2 |
> seriously jakub, stop responding ... you have nothing technical to offer to |
3 |
> the issue at hand |
4 |
> |
5 |
> let the people who work on portage handle it |
6 |
> -mike |
7 |
|
8 |
Eh, the whole technical point here is that paludis behaviour differs |
9 |
from portage (and differs from pkgcore, FWIW). |
10 |
|
11 |
So, hiding the inconsistency via altering the profiles doesn't change |
12 |
anything. Plus, the point of the bug's flame fest was that bugzilla is |
13 |
not a proper place to request such behaviour changes, and definitely not |
14 |
a reason for QA to mess with the profiles. Sticking the stuff in |
15 |
package.mask won't make the inconsistent behaviour vanish in any way, it |
16 |
will just hide it. |
17 |
|
18 |
So, I'd kinda appreciate if concerned folks (including portage and |
19 |
relevant affected arches) were involved in this discussion, instead of |
20 |
sneaking the changes in under QA disguise. |
21 |
|
22 |
Thanks. |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Best regards, |
27 |
|
28 |
Jakub Moc |
29 |
mailto:jakub@g.o |
30 |
GPG signature: |
31 |
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
32 |
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
33 |
|
34 |
... still no signature ;) |