1 |
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 23:58:50 +0300 |
2 |
Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 18:50:45 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
4 |
> > >>>>> On Thu, 23 Feb 2017, Andrew Savchenko wrote: |
5 |
> > >> https://projects.gentoo.org/pms/6/pms.html#x1-180003.1.1 |
6 |
> > >> "Category Names" |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > > I don't see a requirement here, only note on most common |
9 |
> > > pattern: |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > > ``Note: A hyphen is not required because of the virtual category. |
12 |
> > > Usually, however, category names will contain a hyphen.'' |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > It is a note on what is the exclusive pattern, with the single |
15 |
> > exception of the virtual category. I believe that we shouldn't break |
16 |
> > that pattern. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> I'm fine with this approach, but could PMS be updated to contain |
19 |
> more clear statement to avoid misunderstanding? E.g.: |
20 |
> ``all category names must contain a single hyphen with a |
21 |
> special exception for "virtual"'' |
22 |
|
23 |
It's not a "must". Also, putting that rule in and having the package |
24 |
mangler enforce it can have unintended consequences: for example, |
25 |
there used to be the mild nuisance of dealing with overlays which |
26 |
didn't contain a categories list, and which did contain directories |
27 |
named CVS all over the place. |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
Ciaran McCreesh |