| 1 |
On 30/10/2012 13:04, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
| 2 |
> #1 - the MAX_BOOST_VERSION thing isn't needed anymore (and i get the |
| 3 |
> impression that it actually is, but putting that aside since i don't |
| 4 |
> maintain any packages that depend on boost), and |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
It'll just behave like _every other library_ we have in the tree, as |
| 7 |
Samuli and Alexis already said. And it'll follow the same policy. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> #2 - anything requiring boost gets bumped to EAPI5 to get the |
| 10 |
> slot-operator benefits for rebuilds, |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I'm not sure if it's strictly needed but it's fine. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes |
| 16 |
flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |
Archives