| 1 |
Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Which you won't have to deal with for long, 2006.0 is being worked on as |
| 4 |
> we speak. The basic jist of this is that what you are seeing is pretty |
| 5 |
> much expected behavior for bootstrapping using a stage with an older |
| 6 |
> GCC. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
The way I read it, the gcc-3.4.4-r1.ebuild includes a dependency on |
| 9 |
libstdc++-v3 and =sys-devel/gcc-3.3* if "build" is not in your USE |
| 10 |
environment. The bootstrap during bootstrap.sh sets that build flag. Any |
| 11 |
subsequent installs of gcc-3.4.4-r1 are going to install libstdc++-v3, no |
| 12 |
matter what you do (at least x86 users). Or maybe I am just reading that |
| 13 |
PDEPEND wrong. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Regardless, I have never had to mask out lower versions of gcc before. I |
| 16 |
assumed the reason for the dependency was a half ass attempt to keep idiots |
| 17 |
from thoughtlessly destroying their toolchain. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives