| 1 |
On 22 June 2010 16:54, Peter Hjalmarsson <xake@×××××××××.net> wrote: |
| 2 |
> tis 2010-06-22 klockan 15:17 +0530 skrev Arun Raghavan: |
| 3 |
>> On 21 June 2010 21:23, Arun Raghavan <ford_prefect@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> [...] |
| 5 |
>> > I'm still trying to think of a good name. I understand the concerns |
| 6 |
>> > about "introspection" being too generic and non GNOME-y, but "gir" is |
| 7 |
>> > likely to cause confusion. |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> "gir" is not good because it gives near-zero information. |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> I can still not think of short enough USE flag. I propose we stick to |
| 12 |
>> "introspection". There isn't anything on the horizon that might |
| 13 |
>> overlap with this flag, and I don't see why we should drop using a |
| 14 |
>> simpler flag for the *possibility* that it might overlap with |
| 15 |
>> something else in the future. We can deal with this if it happens. |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> Cheers, |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Why not just gintrospection? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I still think "introspection" is easier to grok. It's unlikely that |
| 22 |
it's going to be used in a completely different sense by other |
| 23 |
packages in the future, so let's stick with "introspection" please. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Arun Raghavan |
| 27 |
http://arunraghavan.net/ |
| 28 |
(Ford_Prefect | Gentoo) & (arunsr | GNOME) |
Archives