Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Lastrites: media-sound/logitechmediaserver-bin, net-dialup/misdn, net-dialup/misdnuser, net-misc/asterisk-chan_misdn, www-apache/mod_authn_pam, www-apache/mod_cplusplus, net-dialup/ltmodem, =dev-libs/gmime-2.2.27-r1, www-apache/mod_spin, www-apache/mod_python, dev-dotnet/galago-sharp, sys-apps/galago-daemon, dev-libs/libgalago, www-apache/mod_transform, dev-util/monodevelop-java, dev-util/monodevelop-python, dev-util/monodevelop-vala, media-libs/libdlna, media-video/ushare, app-admin/flexlm, net-misc/cisco-vpnclient-3des, app-emulation/systemsim-cell, sys-block/gcloop, games-roguelike/noegnud-data, games-roguelike/noegnud-nethack, games-roguelike/noegnud-slashem
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 23:02:22
Message-Id: CAG2jQ8hT7k4cisB4rFcyzKyMpNx2wgU3ZMkV4Fmu0UzqR6mAjw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Lastrites: media-sound/logitechmediaserver-bin, net-dialup/misdn, net-dialup/misdnuser, net-misc/asterisk-chan_misdn, www-apache/mod_authn_pam, www-apache/mod_cplusplus, net-dialup/ltmodem, =dev-libs/gmime-2.2.27-r1, www-apache/mod_spin, www-apache/mod_python, dev-dotnet/galago-sharp, sys-apps/galago-daemon, dev-libs/libgalago, www-apache/mod_transform, dev-util/monodevelop-java, dev-util/monodevelop-python, dev-util/monodevelop-vala, media-libs/libdlna, media-video/ushare, app-admin/flexlm, net-misc/cisco-vpnclient-3des, app-emulation/systemsim-cell, sys-block/gcloop, games-roguelike/noegnud-data, games-roguelike/noegnud-nethack, games-roguelike/noegnud-slashem by "Diego Elio Pettenò"
1 On 27 December 2012 00:25, Diego Elio Pettenò <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu> wrote:
2 > On 26/12/2012 23:19, Markos Chandras wrote:
3 >> To be honest, I see no reason for masking packages for removal because
4 >> they don't build with libav-9. I don't know much about libav-9 but to
5 >> my understanding it is supposed to provide an API similar to ffmpeg
6 >> (that's why we have the virtual after all). This means that if the API
7 >> is now broken, there is nothing wrong with the package, as libav-9 is
8 >> not API compatible with ffmpeg. I guess the best solution here is to
9 >> remove the virtual/ffmpeg from dependencies and use just
10 >> media-video/ffmpeg. Of course, the libav maintainers should know
11 >> better.
12 >
13 > Have you tried it with the masked ffmpeg? Because there's a tracker for
14 > that as well, and it so happens that shares most of the failure (since
15 > ffmpeg merges back most of libav changes anyway).
16 >
17 > So basically, you're out of luck if you hope that you don't have to look
18 > to make this compatible with the new API.
19 >
20 > --
21 > Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
22 > flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
23 >
24
25 No I haven't. Like I said I don't know much about the
26 similarities/differences between ffmpeg and libav. So you say that the
27 masked ffmepg provides the same API with the libav-9? Thanks for the
28 info, I was not aware of that.
29
30 --
31 Regards,
32 Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2

Replies