From: | Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Lastrites: media-sound/logitechmediaserver-bin, net-dialup/misdn, net-dialup/misdnuser, net-misc/asterisk-chan_misdn, www-apache/mod_authn_pam, www-apache/mod_cplusplus, net-dialup/ltmodem, =dev-libs/gmime-2.2.27-r1, www-apache/mod_spin, www-apache/mod_python, dev-dotnet/galago-sharp, sys-apps/galago-daemon, dev-libs/libgalago, www-apache/mod_transform, dev-util/monodevelop-java, dev-util/monodevelop-python, dev-util/monodevelop-vala, media-libs/libdlna, media-video/ushare, app-admin/flexlm, net-misc/cisco-vpnclient-3des, app-emulation/systemsim-cell, sys-block/gcloop, games-roguelike/noegnud-data, games-roguelike/noegnud-nethack, games-roguelike/noegnud-slashem | ||
Date: | Wed, 26 Dec 2012 23:02:22 | ||
Message-Id: | CAG2jQ8hT7k4cisB4rFcyzKyMpNx2wgU3ZMkV4Fmu0UzqR6mAjw@mail.gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Lastrites: media-sound/logitechmediaserver-bin, net-dialup/misdn, net-dialup/misdnuser, net-misc/asterisk-chan_misdn, www-apache/mod_authn_pam, www-apache/mod_cplusplus, net-dialup/ltmodem, =dev-libs/gmime-2.2.27-r1, www-apache/mod_spin, www-apache/mod_python, dev-dotnet/galago-sharp, sys-apps/galago-daemon, dev-libs/libgalago, www-apache/mod_transform, dev-util/monodevelop-java, dev-util/monodevelop-python, dev-util/monodevelop-vala, media-libs/libdlna, media-video/ushare, app-admin/flexlm, net-misc/cisco-vpnclient-3des, app-emulation/systemsim-cell, sys-block/gcloop, games-roguelike/noegnud-data, games-roguelike/noegnud-nethack, games-roguelike/noegnud-slashem by "Diego Elio Pettenò" |
1 | On 27 December 2012 00:25, Diego Elio Pettenò <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu> wrote: |
2 | > On 26/12/2012 23:19, Markos Chandras wrote: |
3 | >> To be honest, I see no reason for masking packages for removal because |
4 | >> they don't build with libav-9. I don't know much about libav-9 but to |
5 | >> my understanding it is supposed to provide an API similar to ffmpeg |
6 | >> (that's why we have the virtual after all). This means that if the API |
7 | >> is now broken, there is nothing wrong with the package, as libav-9 is |
8 | >> not API compatible with ffmpeg. I guess the best solution here is to |
9 | >> remove the virtual/ffmpeg from dependencies and use just |
10 | >> media-video/ffmpeg. Of course, the libav maintainers should know |
11 | >> better. |
12 | > |
13 | > Have you tried it with the masked ffmpeg? Because there's a tracker for |
14 | > that as well, and it so happens that shares most of the failure (since |
15 | > ffmpeg merges back most of libav changes anyway). |
16 | > |
17 | > So basically, you're out of luck if you hope that you don't have to look |
18 | > to make this compatible with the new API. |
19 | > |
20 | > -- |
21 | > Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes |
22 | > flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |
23 | > |
24 | |
25 | No I haven't. Like I said I don't know much about the |
26 | similarities/differences between ffmpeg and libav. So you say that the |
27 | masked ffmepg provides the same API with the libav-9? Thanks for the |
28 | info, I was not aware of that. |
29 | |
30 | -- |
31 | Regards, |
32 | Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 |