| 1 |
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Anthony G. Basile <blueness@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Alternatively, this may introduce problems. So it seems like we're |
| 4 |
> fixing something that isn't broken. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
What problems are you anticipating, especially in light of the fact |
| 8 |
that many distros actually do it this way already? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I don't really have a problem with making it optional or the default. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
It can also be left up to the maintainers, and of course somebody |
| 13 |
could even fork baselayout/etc if they wish and virtualize it in |
| 14 |
@system. Most things in Gentoo don't actually require a consensus to |
| 15 |
move forward, especially if they aren't defaults. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
In any case, what is the point of this thread? If somebody wants to |
| 18 |
implement a merged /usr what exactly is stopping them from doing so? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Rich |
Archives