Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Aaron W. Swenson" <titanofold@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 16:59:50
Message-Id: 4FC65199.9000504@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by Tobias Klausmann
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 05/30/2012 12:53 PM, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> Hi! > > On Wed, 30 May 2012, Rich Freeman wrote: >> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:16 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> >> wrote: >>> Yeah... this is why I was asking about access to infra to test >>> the conversion; so far, I haven't had any replies, though. >> >> A mock conversion would probably help with creating >> procedures/docs/etc as well. It is nice to say that we're "just >> going to use git" but I think everybody has a slightly different >> picture of how that is going to work. > > I recommend having a smallish set of willing alpha/beta testers > for this. This usually helps with some of the near-edge cases. > You'll still find a thousand other bugs once things go live for > everybody. Still, it turns a million into a thousand. It also gives > you slightly more realistic load test. .... Regards, Tobias >
As one that's relatively new to Git, I'm a perfect candidate for testing. If we go this way, I volunteer. - - Aaron -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAk/GUZkACgkQVxOqA9G7/aDxogEAjEsS6k0M9TejvCAoYISvuk1u odo5ecLsyshwvwRlk3sA+wUeVAfGrafgH1gKpSrEedk1OT5x7HfsMquK0owq0/Np =mzDU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies