Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Aaron W. Swenson" <titanofold@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 16:59:50
Message-Id: 4FC65199.9000504@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by Tobias Klausmann
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA256
3
4 On 05/30/2012 12:53 PM, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
5 > Hi!
6 >
7 > On Wed, 30 May 2012, Rich Freeman wrote:
8 >> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:16 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o>
9 >> wrote:
10 >>> Yeah... this is why I was asking about access to infra to test
11 >>> the conversion; so far, I haven't had any replies, though.
12 >>
13 >> A mock conversion would probably help with creating
14 >> procedures/docs/etc as well. It is nice to say that we're "just
15 >> going to use git" but I think everybody has a slightly different
16 >> picture of how that is going to work.
17 >
18 > I recommend having a smallish set of willing alpha/beta testers
19 > for this. This usually helps with some of the near-edge cases.
20 > You'll still find a thousand other bugs once things go live for
21 > everybody. Still, it turns a million into a thousand. It also gives
22 > you slightly more realistic load test. .... Regards, Tobias
23 >
24
25 As one that's relatively new to Git, I'm a perfect candidate for
26 testing. If we go this way, I volunteer.
27
28 - - Aaron
29 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
30 Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
31 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
32
33 iF4EAREIAAYFAk/GUZkACgkQVxOqA9G7/aDxogEAjEsS6k0M9TejvCAoYISvuk1u
34 odo5ecLsyshwvwRlk3sA+wUeVAfGrafgH1gKpSrEedk1OT5x7HfsMquK0owq0/Np
35 =mzDU
36 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies