1 |
> Hi lads, |
2 |
> due to recent situation about .la files status we would like to inform |
3 |
> users about this situation. See attached file that we propose to be |
4 |
> included as news item. |
5 |
> |
6 |
|
7 |
Would it not be a better solution to have this information documented |
8 |
"properly" under Upgrade Guides or Gentoo System Documentation and then have |
9 |
this news item linked to it. |
10 |
|
11 |
What i'm concerned about is that this is not really a news item. From what I |
12 |
understand this issue could be with us for a rather long time (years even) |
13 |
so... |
14 |
|
15 |
How is this news item going to help ppl in a month from now (till the issue is |
16 |
solved in its entirety). |
17 |
Can we reasonably expect a new user to be aware of this. Do we expect users |
18 |
to read old ( and this could potentially become very old) news items. |
19 |
|
20 |
This is potentually a different situation from someone updating dbus (for |
21 |
example) from <y.y.y to >=y.y.y and having a once off (fire and forget) |
22 |
migration task. It is for this reason that I think this should be documented. |
23 |
|
24 |
Alistair. |
25 |
|
26 |
> Step 2 will be finding global policy how to get rid of them as fast as |
27 |
> possible without too much more hassle for our users :) |
28 |
> |
29 |
> -------- |
30 |
> Tomáš Chvátal |
31 |
> Gentoo Linux Developer [Clustering/Council/KDE/QA/Sci/X11] |
32 |
> E-Mail : scarabeus@g.o |
33 |
> GnuPG FP : 94A4 5CCD 85D3 DE24 FE99 F924 1C1E 9CDE 0341 4587 |
34 |
> GnuPG ID : 03414587 |