Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 16:52:48
Message-Id: BANLkTi=O1x+6gpU6ZNqWYWxLCnV5Jj92sg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml by Mike Frysinger
1 On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote:
2 > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 13:51, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
3 >> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
4 >>> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:23, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
5 >>>> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, justin wrote:
6 >>>>> Another question, do we have a rule, how the metadata.xml has to be
7 >>>>> indented? Tabs or n spaces?
8 >>>>
9 >>>> There's no rule, but we should follow the same rule as ebuilds —
10 >>>> indentation should be with a tab that's displayed as 4 spaces in
11 >>>> editors (no expansion of tabs to spaces).
12 >>>
13 >>> meh ... let devs do whatever they want
14 >>
15 >> Didn't I just say there's no rule?
16 >
17 > and if you keep reading, you'll see that you also said "devs should XXX"
18 >
19
20 should != must.
21
22 I understand that you're touchy about rules after the whole ChangeLog
23 mess, but must we debate the nuances of the English language and
24 contribute to the massive amount of pre-existing bikeshed noise on
25 this mailing list?
26
27 --
28 ~Nirbheek Chauhan
29
30 Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>