Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 16:52:48
Message-Id: BANLkTi=O1x+6gpU6ZNqWYWxLCnV5Jj92sg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml by Mike Frysinger
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 13:51, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:23, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: >>>> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, justin wrote: >>>>> Another question, do we have a rule, how the metadata.xml has to be >>>>> indented? Tabs or n spaces? >>>> >>>> There's no rule, but we should follow the same rule as ebuilds — >>>> indentation should be with a tab that's displayed as 4 spaces in >>>> editors (no expansion of tabs to spaces). >>> >>> meh ... let devs do whatever they want >> >> Didn't I just say there's no rule? > > and if you keep reading, you'll see that you also said "devs should XXX" >
should != must. I understand that you're touchy about rules after the whole ChangeLog mess, but must we debate the nuances of the English language and contribute to the massive amount of pre-existing bikeshed noise on this mailing list? -- ~Nirbheek Chauhan Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>