| 1 |
hi ! |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > afaik, there are plans to provide an uninstall feature in the |
| 4 |
> > high-level emerge command. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Yes, a better way of unmerging would be nice. eunmerge perhaps?, making |
| 7 |
> emerge unmerge seems a little strange to me. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
why not "emerge <ebuild> uninstall" ? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> I guess we could make an eunmerge, and whatever more we want then do a |
| 13 |
> epkg tool that takes flags (if one wants just one tool for controlling |
| 14 |
> portage). |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> epkg --install gnumeric-0.68.ebuild (short -i) |
| 17 |
> epkg --remove gnumeric (short -r) |
| 18 |
> epkg --update gnumeric (short -u) |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> I also thinkt that we should add the ability to just do |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> epkg -i gnumeric (which takes the latest non-blocked gnumeric-package |
| 23 |
> and emerges it). |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
yeah, a packaging system should be able to handle the version stuff on its own. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> epkg -i gnome-office/gnumeric should also be valid. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> Regards, |
| 30 |
> Mikael Hallendal |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
and with a tool like epkg in mind, one could merge the idea |
| 33 |
of having a local portage-tree and let epkg look there first by default. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
less than $0.02 of mine |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
ciao |
| 38 |
peter |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
----------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 41 |
peter kadau |
| 42 |
email: peter.kadau@×××.de |
| 43 |
open source is no religion - it just produces the most reliable software |
| 44 |
----------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 45 |
_______________________________________________________________________ |
| 46 |
1.000.000 DM gewinnen - kostenlos tippen - http://millionenklick.web.de |
| 47 |
IhrName@×××.de, 8MB Speicher, Verschluesselung - http://freemail.web.de |
Archives