1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 06/20/2012 05:12 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
5 |
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 17:05:55 -0400 Richard Yao <ryao@g.o> |
6 |
> wrote: |
7 |
>>>> The multilib-portage overlay already has this working. |
8 |
>>> |
9 |
>>> But there is no spec, nor is there a developer-centric |
10 |
>>> description of it. |
11 |
> |
12 |
>> I missed this tibbit. I am not sure what you expect me to do this |
13 |
>> about this. Thomas Sachau developed the multilib overlay, he has |
14 |
>> put a great deal of work into it and he likely has a |
15 |
>> specification. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> He has something, but it's nowhere near what's needed for someone |
18 |
> to be able to either implement it independently or produce a PMS |
19 |
> patch. General consensus seems to be that it needs a GLEP and a |
20 |
> proposed diff against PMS before anyone can even reasonably pass |
21 |
> comment on it, let alone accept it. |
22 |
> |
23 |
|
24 |
A new EAPI implies a GLEP. |
25 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
26 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) |
27 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
28 |
|
29 |
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJP4kIDAAoJECDuEZm+6Exk9vMP/0dP/XzzX0zifeyfHDl4wqdc |
30 |
RtfBbDX4C4Rm+5Ii8P/GbegDBxnZ+/SzBynx+d23mvNiAu1B5SKcAoa0dR5k2IIa |
31 |
IiftgPbu1nfPA9ijNcdhi6VlFbjXJVllJt3Q7BfZTu8sPrKiq0Qbi4fnpJP4OFVH |
32 |
XY/17GUhZy5sizpsqFIZQTggvcqVdkM99iZCey32egIhqXHM7tn8fl9StziP+dlE |
33 |
4/JzkPqVCv8QojarxAGI3asQ3ysMzbVa2zRo9FGQtMi23AqiTvnakIahy6b+U5C1 |
34 |
holKFfTkCdp2mJAw8FHZtNeQ+DMAOSj069YTCct+fOIv6HaT5sAHYjO1ovSOkYRw |
35 |
VZ0SfwTlCr8dbFCpur1YbZkfBpDuhAtJq9MbQbzuqjXQXy6y2KQlHJDi7FHJCuDl |
36 |
0xKlxb1nenRk1RbxWNz6Tc530G+AkwrMnqmIlEI5X1p8J6xXwDnA7I4uAUfXhnY2 |
37 |
Au72AeratlSIMBYuR75ocHaaFKDhK1bG0Yu1W3Kw7hwMwaEmWHLgAr4Ne/PynwUw |
38 |
/tck8Dl/F1vnnzR/YqY14rwC1b3tbuMdsGc2sO33sNHJw16EQTJklETV7KBhqQhf |
39 |
wej+MTZInbOMF0m4giyohJ+6jWaAXKQhsHo8+h1SmRY/0SLuIQPySPSI01y9Gcun |
40 |
PY3t9ESaVd9kZMo10trj |
41 |
=/oj6 |
42 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |