| 1 |
Dne neděle 08 Listopad 2009 17:57:10 Jeroen Roovers napsal(a): |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 18:24:10 +0100 |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > * Masking beta... |
| 6 |
> > This masks are good if the software release is KNOWN to break |
| 7 |
> > previous behaviour or degrade user experience. Otherwise the software |
| 8 |
> > should not be masked (its TESTING for purpose, not stable). |
| 9 |
> > Also the maintainer should watch if the testing branch is still |
| 10 |
> > relevant (why on earth we have masked 4.0.3_p20070403 version of |
| 11 |
> > screen when newer 4.3 is stable ;]) and remove the branch+mask when |
| 12 |
> > needed. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> I agree with your criticism (i.e. that the mask should not be there, |
| 15 |
> especially not for "testing" as what the mask does is *prevent* testing |
| 16 |
> instead of enabling it), but must note that your version sorting |
| 17 |
> algorithm appears to be flawed: pkg-vX_pY (for patch level) is always |
| 18 |
> greater than pkg-vX. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Regards, |
| 22 |
> jer |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
I agree that _p is newer than that. |
| 25 |
But if we look on tag of screen-4.0.3 or its release: |
| 26 |
screen-4.0.2.tar.gz 27-Jan-2004 05:46 821K |
| 27 |
screen-4.0.2.tar.gz.sig 27-Jan-2004 05:47 65 |
| 28 |
screen-4.0.3.tar.gz 07-Aug-2008 06:30 821K |
| 29 |
screen-4.0.3.tar.gz.sig 07-Aug-2008 06:30 65 |
| 30 |
You see the pattern? It is 1 year newer than it. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Tomas |
Archives