Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Benedikt Böhm <hollow@g.o>
Subject: Re: The Python problem
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 20:23:07 +0200
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> wrote:
> So I know a bunch of people have already looked at it, and I'd like to
> know: what do you find better about the Ruby approach compared to the
> Python approach? Is it just the size of python.eclass, or are there a
> number of other issues?

the way python applications are built currently renders all binary
packages useless, since portage does not know which version of python
it was built against. the explicit selection with RUBY_TARGETS or
PHP_TARGETS solves this problem at the small cost of commiting new
values to these variables from time to time.


Replies:
Re: The Python problem
-- Dirkjan Ochtman
References:
The Python problem
-- Dirkjan Ochtman
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: The Python problem
Next by thread:
Re: The Python problem
Previous by date:
Re: Are tags just sets?
Next by date:
Re: Don't use / when applying sed with CFLAGS


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.