1 |
Samuli Suominen schrieb: |
2 |
> On 10/01/2011 08:02 PM, Chi-Thanh Christopher Nguyen (chithanh) wrote: |
3 |
>> chithanh 11/10/01 17:02:59 |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> Added: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild |
6 |
>> Log: |
7 |
>> Bring back qutecom. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Bringing back version of qutecom, that is forcing downgrade on |
10 |
> linux-headers, when >= 2.6.38 is being stabilized is completely |
11 |
> unacceptable. |
12 |
|
13 |
Please point to existing authoritative documentation which says that |
14 |
downgrades are unacceptable. |
15 |
|
16 |
> It is NOT gentoo-x86 compatible package in it's current form. |
17 |
|
18 |
It sets correct dependency on an existing ebuild in tree. The dependency |
19 |
is only build time, users can upgrade linux-headers again afterwards. |
20 |
The application itself is v4l2 compatible. |
21 |
|
22 |
What I am a bit unhappy about is that the package was masked and removed |
23 |
while I was away. Even bypassing the usual 30 days and no last rite |
24 |
announcement was sent to -dev. |
25 |
|
26 |
Bug 361181 is certainly on my TODO list, just not very high up to now. |
27 |
If you think that there is some urgency in getting rid of the package, |
28 |
please do explain so in advance. |
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
Best regards, |
32 |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |