Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Does anyone use kxicq?
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 21:35:40
Message-Id: 200301312328.50281.danarmak@gentoo.org
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Hello everyone,
5
6 The kxicq project, though perhaps not officially dead, seems rather catatonic
7 (admittedly i haven't tried contacting the developers). The last release was
8 over a year ago for kde2, and their cvs hasn't seen any activity for two
9 months now; we have a patched snapshot of their CVS that works for kde3, but
10 now there's a bugreport against it (#13105). There are several icq clients in
11 portage (licq and sim have qt/kde interfaces) and I wouldn't have any
12 objection to dropping one that isn't really actively developed anymore. Of
13 course, that's likely the maintainer speaking :-)
14
15 I'm not saying I've decided to remove the kxicq ebuild, but I'd like to know
16 how many people (if at all) use it. If people reply to this saying "yes I use
17 it and don't want to switch", the decision will of course be taken out of my
18 hands, I won't decide to remove it from portage then. So please mail me if
19 that is the case.
20
21 Someone, please forward this to gento-user as I'm not subscribed there. If
22 you're reading this anywhere other than the gentoo-dev list, please cc your
23 replies to me. (No need to cc replies that don't say you use it.)
24
25 Thanks,
26
27 - --
28 Dan Armak
29 Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
30 Matan, Israel
31 Public GPG key: http://www.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key
32 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
33 Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
34
35 iD8DBQE+OuqSUI2RQ41fiVERAtjoAJ9Ocr65ppi/ISvbmxhS1T4s0V3CVwCfd3tx
36 qqYP4o8E+OOn+bsqcAiz+yU=
37 =yXI3
38 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
39
40
41 --
42 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Does anyone use kxicq? Paul de Vrieze <gentoo-user@××××××××.net>