1 |
On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 14:54:39 -0300 |
2 |
Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Sun, 1 Jan 2012 00:16:29 -0600 |
5 |
> Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
> |
7 |
> > On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 19:59:47 -0600 |
8 |
> > William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > > Udev, kmod (which is a replacement for module-init-tools which |
11 |
> > > will be needed by >=udev-176), systemd, and soon others, are |
12 |
> > > advocating a major change to the locations where binaries and |
13 |
> > > libraries are stored on linux systems. |
14 |
> > > |
15 |
> > > The goal is to deprecate /bin, /lib, /sbin and /usr/sbin. My |
16 |
> > > understanding is that they want to move software that is installed |
17 |
> > > in /bin, /sbin and /usr/sbin to /usr/bin. Also, they want to move |
18 |
> > > everything from /lib to /usr/lib. |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> > I coulda swore April was another four months away... |
21 |
> |
22 |
> no, in April they will declare the zillions of #!/bin/sh scripts |
23 |
> broken because they rely on a so old unix standard :=) |
24 |
|
25 |
Yes, we should migrate to #!/usr/bin/env sh :P. |
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Best regards, |
30 |
Michał Górny |