Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Matthew Kennedy <mbkennedy@...>
Subject: best practices for java ebuilds
Date: 03 Feb 2002 12:33:38 -0600
At the momemt I am creating ebuilds for my favoutite stuff. When
packaging Java packages though, should I compile them from source
always? I noticed Ant (dev-java/ant) is an example such a package. It
seems to me, that there is little point in compiling most Java items if
a binary is already available in a timely and reliable manner (meaning a
binary build comes out at the approximate same time the new source
release does).

So might this be the rule of thumb: If some Java application/binary is
already available from the authors site in both binary and source form,
and the author provides a binary build frequently and reliably, then use
the binary from the ebuild?

Thanks,

Matt



Replies:
Re: best practices for java ebuilds
-- Karl Trygve Kalleberg
Re: best practices for java ebuilds
-- Matthew Kennedy
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Ethical Policy
Next by thread:
Re: best practices for java ebuilds
Previous by date:
Re: masked portage 1.8.8-r1
Next by date:
Re: best practices for java ebuilds


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.