List Archive: gentoo-dev
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 04:21:06PM -0400, Jon Portnoy wrote:
> > Instead of creating a new libcap license file, I think we should
> > abstract the package name in PAM/PWDB and point all 3 items to this.
> > Possible name is $PORTAGE/licenses/BSD_GPL
> Dual licenses are usually done like:
> LICENSE="BSD GPL-2"
> Any reason that wouldn't apply here?
I asked because PAM and PWDB seem to have their own license files rather
than that common dual license solution. If you look at their license
files, there is a single additional clause in addition to the BSD/GPL-2
licenses to make them compatible together (otherwise according to FSF
Robin Hugh Johnson
E-Mail : robbat2@...
Home Page : http://www.orbis-terrarum.net/?l=people.robbat2
ICQ# : 30269588 or 41961639
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85