Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@...>
Subject: Re: GCC 4.6.0
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 05:50:32 +0000 (UTC)
Ryan Hill posted on Sat, 02 Apr 2011 22:11:12 -0600 as excerpted:

>   You may also want to test your packages with the new -Ofast option to
>   be sure it doesn't have any hardcoded assumptions about -O flags.

The release description I've read for -Ofast says it includes -fast-math, 
among other things, a flag Gentoo has always strongly discouraged (you 
break with it, you keep the pieces) and which can get bugs resolved/
invalid as a result.

Now that gcc 4.6 itself is more strongly supporting it as enabled with one 
of the -O options, is that policy going to change, or is Gentoo going to 
officially not support -Ofast, as well?

Or is that yet to be established, thru testing?

FWIW, I've always stayed away from that flag, but if Gentoo's going to 
support it now, that may well change, tho I'd certainly disable it for 
specific packages using /etc/portage/env/*, as I already do for 
-combine, in my default CFLAGS but not CXXFLAGS, for instance.

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman



Replies:
Re: GCC 4.6.0
-- Ryan Hill
References:
GCC 4.6.0
-- Ryan Hill
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
GCC 4.6.0
Next by thread:
Re: GCC 4.6.0
Previous by date:
GCC 4.6.0
Next by date:
Re: Packages up for grabs


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.