Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Fredrik Jagenheim <humming@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Is there a process for marking ebuilds stable?
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 11:04:39
Message-Id: 20030414110436.GC441@pobox.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Is there a process for marking ebuilds stable? by Michael Kohl
1 On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 05:00:39PM +0800, Michael Kohl wrote:
2 > Also it maybe would be a nice thing to have a switch for this script to
3 > automatically submit all packages which it finds where installed using
4 > ~ARCH as "emerged sucessfully" (which I suppose they were if they land
5 > in /var/db/pkg). This way it would be possible to set it up as a cronjob
6 > so people (who are generally lazy from my experience) wouldn't have to
7 > rate each package individually. Althoug this information is not quite as
8 > good as "the full thing" but somehow I doubt all this people would be
9 > running gentoo-stats if they had to do more then set up the crontab
10 > once...
11
12 You have several valid points. I agree that people are lazy and they
13 would probably not run gentoo-stats if it wasn't croned. Although I
14 don't see the need of a script that would check for if a package was
15 emerged correctly. This could as well be done by emerge when it
16 detects it is installing an ~ARCH package. This way you don't have to
17 wonder if it's a 'current' package or not.
18
19 Heck, you could use the same mechanism for reporting 'stable' packages
20 when they fail.
21
22 However, a successful emerge is only one of the critieria for an
23 unstable package to move to stable. It not crashing runtime is
24 another...
25
26 Actually, the more I think of it, the whole point is moot...
27 stable.gentoo.org might be a good idea, but why not replace it with
28 stats.gentoo.org? If I submit a stat report which tells me that I have
29 the latest version of a package installed, you could assume that it
30 works for me. If not, I'd post a bugreport. And if I couldn't be arsed
31 to set up gentoo-stats and post bugs about things that doesn't work,
32 why would I use stable.gentoo.org anyway?
33
34 Please, don't see this as an attack on stable.gentoo.org, just trying
35 to see it in another perspective... And I probably missed something in
36 that generalization...
37
38 > Sorry for this rather long a quite unfocussed post, mid-term exams are
39 > on the horizon again so I maybe should just shut up and grab my books...
40
41 Exams are important, but so is gentoo. ;)
42
43 //H
44 --
45 To segfault is human; to bluescreen moronic.
46
47 --
48 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Is there a process for marking ebuilds stable? Mikael Andersson <snikkt@×××××.com>