| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:04:14 +0530 |
| 3 |
> Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> The spirit and the letter of the rules are clear: the electorate can |
| 6 |
> vote in whoever they want, and council members can appoint whoever they |
| 7 |
> want so long as no-one has multiple votes at any given meaning. GLEP 39 |
| 8 |
> is very clear and explicit about all the restrictions. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
No one, and I mean no one (other than dev-zero apparently) wants you |
| 12 |
voting on anything. |
| 13 |
If your ties to GLEP's 54/55 are not sufficient to cause you a conflict |
| 14 |
of interests then |
| 15 |
your ties to exherbo do. I would not _ever_ be able to accept a proxy |
| 16 |
offer in good |
| 17 |
conscience because of my work on Funtoo. |
| 18 |
Your lack of integrity, followed by your bellicose attitude simply |
| 19 |
astounds me. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
dev-zero should not have offered, and I think there needs to be a |
| 22 |
discussion as to why |
| 23 |
he did. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Ciaran, you should not EVER have accepted it. The council was right in |
| 26 |
throwing |
| 27 |
it out. This isn't hard, we don't need a whole new set of rules and |
| 28 |
amendments to glep 39, |
| 29 |
we need developers and participants with common sense. Your behavior |
| 30 |
disgusts me (though I |
| 31 |
can point out that this is a continuous problem rather than simply |
| 32 |
contained in this one |
| 33 |
incident.) |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Andrew D Kirch |
| 36 |
Funtoo |
Archives