Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
Subject: Re: RFC: don't define ebeep and epause in eutils in EAPI 3
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 16:30:34 -0500
On Sunday 17 January 2010 16:12:29 David Leverton wrote:
> On Sunday 17 January 2010 20:38:48 Petteri Räty wrote:
> > With GLEP 42 and proper logging of e* messages I think we shouldn't
> > annoy users any more with ebeep or epause so attached is a patch only
> > defines these functions for EAPIs 0, 1 and 2. Anyone have a reason to
> > keep these around for EAPI 3? If not I will apply the attached patch.
> 
> The eclass-manpages comments should be updated too.

you mean you should re-emerge it on your system
-mike
Attachment:
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part.)
Replies:
Re: RFC: don't define ebeep and epause in eutils in EAPI 3
-- Torsten Veller
References:
RFC: don't define ebeep and epause in eutils in EAPI 3
-- Petteri Räty
Re: RFC: don't define ebeep and epause in eutils in EAPI 3
-- David Leverton
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: RFC: don't define ebeep and epause in eutils in EAPI 3
Next by thread:
Re: RFC: don't define ebeep and epause in eutils in EAPI 3
Previous by date:
Re: RFC: don't define ebeep and epause in eutils in EAPI 3
Next by date:
how to indicate "co-maintainers welcome"?


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.