From: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: don't define ebeep and epause in eutils in EAPI 3 | ||
Date: | Sun, 17 Jan 2010 21:31:04 | ||
Message-Id: | 201001171630.35257.vapier@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: don't define ebeep and epause in eutils in EAPI 3 by David Leverton |
1 | On Sunday 17 January 2010 16:12:29 David Leverton wrote: |
2 | > On Sunday 17 January 2010 20:38:48 Petteri Räty wrote: |
3 | > > With GLEP 42 and proper logging of e* messages I think we shouldn't |
4 | > > annoy users any more with ebeep or epause so attached is a patch only |
5 | > > defines these functions for EAPIs 0, 1 and 2. Anyone have a reason to |
6 | > > keep these around for EAPI 3? If not I will apply the attached patch. |
7 | > |
8 | > The eclass-manpages comments should be updated too. |
9 | |
10 | you mean you should re-emerge it on your system |
11 | -mike |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: don't define ebeep and epause in eutils in EAPI 3 | Torsten Veller <ml-en@××××××.net> |