Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alex Alexander <wired@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-libs/mlt: ChangeLog mlt-0.5.4-r1.ebuild
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 13:10:09
Message-Id: 20100814131013.GA1363@linuxized.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-libs/mlt: ChangeLog mlt-0.5.4-r1.ebuild by Markos Chandras
1 On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 03:50:53PM +0300, Markos Chandras wrote:
2 > > - If you are not in cc of the gentoo bug nor in the herd alias, please cc
3 > > yourself on the bug.
4 > > - Please close the bugs, even the dupes (and apply previous point to the dupes
5 > > too).
6 > > - That way you'll be able to quickly fix (apparently, I didn't check) obvious
7 > > mistakes [1].
8 > > - You'll have to do a rev. bump for *FLAGS respect, please also check if you
9 > > can avoid it by doing a version bump instead.
10 > Well not always. If something is on ~testing then I don't think I should
11 > "spam" the tree with revbumps. Stable users are my first priority so
12
13 Stable may be more critical, but we support ~testing as well. How do you
14 expect your changes to be tested before landing on stable if you don't
15 revbump the packages, allowing them to reach our users?
16
17 Please, don't skip revbumps to avoid "tree spamming", thats why we have
18 revbumps in the first place ;)
19
20 > unless something is on stable branch, I fix it as it is. I don't want to
21 > version bump anything because I don't want to mess with anyones
22 > packages. I only do QA fixing. If you have problem touching your
23 > packages just say it
24 > >
25 > > A.
26 > >
27 > > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=332523
28 >
29 > --
30 > Markos Chandras (hwoarang)
31 > Gentoo Linux Developer
32 > Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org
33
34 --
35 Alex Alexander -=- wired
36 Gentoo Linux Developer -=- Council / Qt / KDE / more
37 www.linuxized.com

Replies