| 1 |
Duncan wrote: |
| 2 |
> David Leverton posted on Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:35:53 +0000 as excerpted: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> If we're not going to insist on preserving nanoseconds as far as |
| 5 |
>> possible, then package managers should be required to explcitly clear |
| 6 |
>> the nanoseconds part. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> While I'm not sure what it's going to do to install-times and thus |
| 9 |
> whether it's practical, this /does/ at least in theory make quite some |
| 10 |
> sense to me. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
This seems like a pretty reasonable (and easy) thing to do. All that |
| 13 |
we have to do is round the mtime value before it's passed into the |
| 14 |
os.utime() call. |
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Thanks, |
| 17 |
Zac |
Archives