| 1 |
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:56:56 +0300 |
| 2 |
Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > If a parallel install is overwriting things on / whilst a package is |
| 4 |
> > compiling, things are already horribly broken regardless of this |
| 5 |
> > switch. PMS explicitly forbids that from happening. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> That's that. And then there's the real world. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Yes, and in the real world, if you change / whilst something is |
| 10 |
compiling, things break. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> > > Olivier Crête also has an outstanding comment about a maintainer |
| 13 |
> > > possibly not wanting that disabled in case of patches applied. |
| 14 |
> > > Could use some elaboration on that thought, or comments in |
| 15 |
> > > replies. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> > It's always possible to override it if necessary. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> No. It is possible to not use econf and write all of the options it's |
| 20 |
> supposed to be passing manually. Probably missing something or |
| 21 |
> otherwise being horribly long. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Uh, you just do econf --enable-dependency-tracking. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives