From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem | ||
Date: | Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:34:23 | ||
Message-Id: | 20088.38450.587143.52345@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem by Ciaran McCreesh |
1 | >>>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 | |
3 | >> Paludis wise, it's eapi2 indirictely due to boost and eselect. |
4 | |
5 | > The eselect dependency is hard, and can't easily be made optional, |
6 | > so ideally eselect should stick with older EAPIs. |
7 | |
8 | Eselect's maintainer is well aware of this. I intend to keep 1.2.15 |
9 | (which is EAPI 0) around for some time. |
10 | |
11 | Ulrich |