Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: net-nntp/inn
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 22:27:19
Message-Id: pan.2010.01.12.22.24.27@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: net-nntp/inn by Ben de Groot
1 Ben de Groot posted on Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:35:45 +0100 as excerpted:
2
3 > 2010/1/12 Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>:
4 >> If you feel like it, become a proxy-maintainer and poke a developer to
5 >> put your ebuilds on tree. Have you ever heard of that ? :)
6 >
7 > Proxy-maintainership should be given a MUCH higher profile in Gentoo, in
8 > my opinion. It is a virtually unknown option.
9
10 Yay! =:^)
11
12 > Another thing that works in my experience, but this is up to the
13 > herds/projects, is having an official overlay where devs and users can
14 > work closely together.
15
16 Again! =:^)
17
18 > But I also believe we need a better structure to handle
19 > maintainer-needed, maintainer-wanted and nominally maintained but
20 > ignored packages. Maybe we should form a team, which would be dedicated
21 > to take care of such things, and which would have a review policy for
22 > user submitted ebuilds and patches in bugzilla. A bit like treecleaners,
23 > but bringing life instead of death. What do you think?
24
25 Well, sunrise was supposed to be that for packages not yet in the tree.
26 The devs shepherding that work hard with the users doing the ebuilds to
27 get them up to tree quality, so they're ready for devs to take on with
28 little work (or to go into proxy maintainership), when it's that
29 package's time. I know I've used a handful of sunrise packages that
30 ultimately ended up in the tree, which is pretty good, considering I
31 don't even have the sunrise overlay enabled unless there's something I
32 specifically want from it.
33
34 --
35 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
36 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
37 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman