2008/6/8 Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o>:
> Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
>
>> 1. GLEP54
>> 2. GLEP55
>
> None of them got discussion back in -dev, the glep hadn't been changed as
> requested during the unnecessary long discussion in the meeting.
>
> Looks like the overall consensus is that those aren't useful as they are and
> thus either you fix them, discussing the changes with the people in -dev
> (NOT THE COUNCIL) or you may retract them.

They don't need any more discussion, but people sitting back and
thinking them through.

>> 3. Most wanted changes in future EAPIs
>
> Somebody is thinking the PMS and the EAPI definition as it is are wrong and
> should be replaced since they aren't useful for their purpose.

Somebody? Replaced with what?

--
Best Regards,
Piotr Jaroszyński