On Friday 25 April 2003 14:26, Jani Monoses wrote:
> I'm replying to a digest mail so this won't be in the thread
>
> Paul have you thought of building svn without apache support?
> The latest version 0.22 due to be out in a couple of days will have
> a config option for building without DAV and only with local and ra_svn
> access.This would make it a lot simpler for people who only want to
> manage their local repos or are fine with ra_svn and don't want the
> overhead of apache configuration and the dependency on neon.
> Maybe a new USE flag (apache) would be needed too?
> This way it could be stable independent of apache.
> A lot of people use svn with only ra_svn or local and are content with
> it that way.
> I am using it with bdb 4.0.14 already in portage so I second that
> there's no need to build that too.
> BTW APR is in portage (although only 0.9.2 and not 0.9.3 which is needed
> by svn)
> Anyway it's great that there's some activity with the svn
> ebuild since it was over a year old now.
>

I'm happy to hear that it builds. I will look into using the apache2 use flag, 
and I will look at the status of db4.0.14 which at the moment is still 
masked.

Paul

-- 
Paul de Vrieze
Researcher
Mail: pauldv@...
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net