| 1 |
On Friday 25 April 2003 14:26, Jani Monoses wrote: |
| 2 |
> I'm replying to a digest mail so this won't be in the thread |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Paul have you thought of building svn without apache support? |
| 5 |
> The latest version 0.22 due to be out in a couple of days will have |
| 6 |
> a config option for building without DAV and only with local and ra_svn |
| 7 |
> access.This would make it a lot simpler for people who only want to |
| 8 |
> manage their local repos or are fine with ra_svn and don't want the |
| 9 |
> overhead of apache configuration and the dependency on neon. |
| 10 |
> Maybe a new USE flag (apache) would be needed too? |
| 11 |
> This way it could be stable independent of apache. |
| 12 |
> A lot of people use svn with only ra_svn or local and are content with |
| 13 |
> it that way. |
| 14 |
> I am using it with bdb 4.0.14 already in portage so I second that |
| 15 |
> there's no need to build that too. |
| 16 |
> BTW APR is in portage (although only 0.9.2 and not 0.9.3 which is needed |
| 17 |
> by svn) |
| 18 |
> Anyway it's great that there's some activity with the svn |
| 19 |
> ebuild since it was over a year old now. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I'm happy to hear that it builds. I will look into using the apache2 use flag, |
| 23 |
and I will look at the status of db4.0.14 which at the moment is still |
| 24 |
masked. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Paul |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 30 |
Researcher |
| 31 |
Mail: pauldv@××××××.nl |
| 32 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives