| 1 |
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 11:46:39PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 19/09/2011 19:36, Greg KH wrote: |
| 3 |
> > And for those udev/systemd haters, you all do know about devtmpfs, |
| 4 |
> > right? If not, {sigh}, I don't even know why I care anymore... |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > greg "sick of it all" k-h |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I'm wondering is if devtmpfs covers what is needed to mount /usr so the |
| 9 |
> new and grand udev can do all its stuff... |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
You are kidding me, right? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> Going around upstream asking to provide init.d files themselves might be |
| 14 |
> useful btw. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I have no idea what in the world you are talking about here. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Gibberish, that's all it is these days, gibberish. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Oh wait, this all is a joke on me, right? Ok, that makes more sense, |
| 21 |
hahaha, you all got me, good one. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Sorry, I was being slow here, next time I'll get it quicker, nice one |
| 24 |
people. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
greg k-h |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
p.s. and yes, this is the only reasonable explanation for this whole |
| 29 |
thread, especially given the fact that this whole thing is explained in |
| 30 |
extreme detail on the freedesktop.org site, and it has been beaten to |
| 31 |
death on this very mailing list in the past. Otherwise what other |
| 32 |
reason could this whole thing have been... |
Archives