1.1

В Вск, 13/07/2008 в 23:52 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh пишет:
> Which part of the 'Problem' section in the GLEP didn't you understand?
> Do you seriously consider not being able to add or change global scope
> functions in future EAPIs to be a non-issue, or were you ignoring those
> two bullet points?

I've read all previous discussions but still miss answer to the
question: Why is it impossible to state that .ebuild extension is for
bash based ebuild make package manager get and filter EAPIs based on
EAPI variable?

Note, I assume that we can do not backward-compatible changes in PM, we
just need to wait enough time to start using it. But taking into account
that the features that will make use of this GLEP55 are still not so
evident I don't see any problem to wait. In any case I'd like to
understand why should we start support this hell of extensions.

-- 
Peter.