| 1 |
On 03/28/2011 12:32 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Rémi Cardona wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Le 27/03/2011 10:36, Samuli Suominen a écrit : |
| 4 |
>>> Also, both udisks and upower now have blockers for sys-apps/hal to |
| 5 |
>>> prevent overlapping features. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> I know you want to kill HAL with a vengeance. I don't disagree with the |
| 8 |
>> ultimate goal but I think you've gone too far. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> HAL and u{power,disks} are _perfectly_ parallel installable and there |
| 11 |
>> are absolutely _no_ conflicts between the two. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> Blockers should be used for _file_ conflicts, not for _feature_ |
| 14 |
>> conflicts, otherwise we'd have to mask and get rid of half (or even |
| 15 |
>> more) of all the packages we provide in portage. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> latest pciutils blocks hal, so i think that should cover the "urge |
| 18 |
> people to migrate" aspect in ~arch |
| 19 |
> -mike |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I've changed this to be a bit more friendly. |
| 23 |
As you pointed out, pciutils is one. |
| 24 |
And ~arch version of upower is second. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
KDE really needs to step up and get KDE 4.6.x stabilization bug open, |
| 29 |
and this non-issue would become moot ;-) |
Archives