| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de>: |
| 4 |
> On 11/23/2010 09:32 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Tuesday, November 23, 2010 01:36:15 Graham Murray wrote: |
| 6 |
> >> Mike Frysinger<vapier@g.o> writes: |
| 7 |
> >>> well, not quite. the way we agreed in the past was to not |
| 8 |
> >>> revbump the masked package, but once it was unmasked, we revbump |
| 9 |
> >>> it just once at that point. |
| 10 |
> >> |
| 11 |
> >> Is there somewhere which tells users when there are upgrades to |
| 12 |
> >> toolchain packages which are not revbumped once they have been |
| 13 |
> >> unmasked and in ~arch? |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > if they arent revbumped, then the changes dont matter to you |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> This isn't always the case though, due to developer mistakes. |
| 18 |
> Sometimes when doing emerge -e system, there are changes in /etc |
| 19 |
> files that affect runtime behavior rather than build behavior. And |
| 20 |
> it seems to happen quite often. This is with non-masked packages |
| 21 |
> though. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Sometimes it is not a mistake but laziness. Some minor fixes in |
| 24 |
configuration files are quite common. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
V-Li |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project |
| 30 |
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
<URL:http://gentoo.faulhammer.org/> |
Archives