1 |
Rémi Cardona wrote: |
2 |
> Le 01/09/2009 00:12, Mounir Lamouri a écrit : |
3 |
>> Hi, |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> As you should know, GLEP 23 [1] introduced USE flags conditions in |
6 |
>> LICENSE variable and || operator in addition of licenses groups and |
7 |
>> ACCEPT_LICENSE variable. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0023.html |
10 |
> |
11 |
> /me still thinks LICENSE should be informational _at_best_. Users who |
12 |
> rely on LICENSE to build an FSF-approved system will simply be mislead. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> If we want to support this sort of things properly, we should have a |
15 |
> treewide license audit. Anything short of that will just be a |
16 |
> disservice to our users. |
17 |
I don't think your argument is valid. LICENSE is not informational so we |
18 |
have to deal with it and as GLEP-23 has an issue, we should fix it. I |
19 |
know even with this feature building a free-only system with |
20 |
ACCEPT_LICENSE will not be easy but the tree cleaning or anything else |
21 |
is a next step. Let's focus on what we can do now and what I propose is |
22 |
clearly doable and it will not break anything. |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
Mounir |