| 1 |
On Tuesday 02 March 2010, Sebastian Pipping wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 03/02/10 20:28, Nathan Zachary wrote: |
| 3 |
> >> This looks like overkill to me. One keyword should be enough, and |
| 4 |
> >> for supplementary information "Status Whiteboard" could be used. |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > I agree. Simply having the BUGDAY keyword should be sufficient, |
| 7 |
> > and more information can be provided elsewhere in the report. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> If more than one keyword is commonly considered overkill I would at |
| 10 |
> least request the whiteboard for it: "somewhere in the report" |
| 11 |
> involves more than zero searching for it. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Some people use the whiteboard for their own marking of bugs (e.g. |
| 14 |
security, and myself). If you add more information in there, you might |
| 15 |
be breaking other people's marking / sorting algorithms. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I'd say one keyword BUGDAY is enough. Any bug editor can set and remove |
| 18 |
it and the bug history will show who set and removed it when. Sorting |
| 19 |
any syntax is taken care of by Bugzilla that way. It seems to me problem |
| 20 |
you seem to try to solve (review of bugs) can also be tackled with tools |
| 21 |
displaying new bugs that have the keyword set and just removing the |
| 22 |
keyword. If bugs are repeatedly spammed with BUGDAY comments, talk to |
| 23 |
the spammers or leave a comment. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Robert |
Archives