From: | James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass | ||
Date: | Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:07:00 | ||
Message-Id: | m3zl0zw43i.fsf@lugabout.jhcloos.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass by Ciaran McCreesh |
1 | >>>>> "CM" == Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> writes: |
2 | |
3 | CM> There's no need to offer the user the choice to do something that is |
4 | CM> always broken. Your car doesn't have a "connect the exhaust fumes to |
5 | CM> the air conditioning intake" button. |
6 | |
7 | Overriding portage's eclasses with one's own is not "always broken"; |
8 | your analogy is not at all on point. |
9 | |
10 | -JimC |
11 | -- |
12 | James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6 |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass | "Harald van Dijk" <truedfx@g.o> |