Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic.sk@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] CFLAGS paragraph for the GWN
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 18:06:20
Message-Id: efovnn$sm8$1@sea.gmane.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] CFLAGS paragraph for the GWN by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 Duncan wrote:
2
3 > Could you point me at some info on this one (-ftree-vectorize)? It came
4 > up on the amd64 list a week or so ago, when someone asked what I thought
5 > of it and why I didn't have it in my cflags (which I had just explained).
6 > I said I didn't know enough about it to make a case either way, and as
7 > such, didn't choose to use it. However, after a bit of discussion, I
8 > decided to add it to my cflags on a very experimental basis. I haven't
9 > experienced any issues with it, but then I haven't done any major
10 > compiling since then either, only the routine updates.
11
12 http://tinyurl.com/l75we
13
14 They've fixed quite a few of the ICE's since last I looked, though
15 there's more than a couple that went in after 4.1.1. 4.2 is a little
16 better, but I'm having enough trouble getting it to build things
17 properly _without_ using any fancy flags right now. ;p
18
19 See http://tinyurl.com/rt3aa for some real-world examples.
20
21 > Or does the problem not necessarily apply to amd64? Even knowing that
22 > would be useful. I simply don't know anything much at all about it, beyond
23 > a generally vague idea that it means using mmx/sse/whatever vector
24 > instructions to parallelize loops.
25
26 I'd say that there's more ICE's on i686-pc-linux-gnu than
27 x86_64-*-linux-gnu, but there's still enough. Luckily Halcy0n was
28 really good for reducing testcases and pushing them upstream, so a lot
29 of these issues got fixed at the source.
30
31 --de.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] CFLAGS paragraph for the GWN Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>