| 1 |
Am Donnerstag, 7. September 2006 11:11 schrieb Stuart Herbert: |
| 2 |
> On 9/7/06, Carsten Lohrke <carlo@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > How wonderful this sort of "maintenance" is you can read here: |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146626 |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > Am I the only one who has a problem with this? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> No. And I'm sure I'm not the only one who has a problem with your |
| 10 |
> comment in that bug either. Bugzilla isn't there for flaming other |
| 11 |
> devs. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> There was a time when we used to suspend devs for doing that. |
| 14 |
Sadly we don't suspend developers for extended history of QA violations. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Danny |
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o> |
| 19 |
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives