List Archive: gentoo-dev
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On 06/19/10 05:20, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> you're confusing talk and jokes between developers on a particular
> private room with tone between members of the global community in public
It wasn't #gentoo-roughshit, it was in #gentoo-infra - the place devs go
on infra matters. To the outside of Gentoo it may be a private channel,
to Gentoo itself it is not (or should not be) a private channel. I can
expect proper tone from an infra related channel just like from #gentoo-doc.
> You're also missing an important point that some channels have their own
> environment and so one should start by understanding it. Furthermore,
> pushing for change and or imposing one's view on an established channel
> is not a "nice" way to deal with the residents of that channel.
> Another thing you've just done and should be aware of, is that you chose
> to air into the public private conservations. When any Gentoo developer
> decides to reveal a private discussion in the core ml or some other
> private medium into the general public without the other parties
> knowledge and or consent, that developer is abusing the other members'
If #gentoo-infra bangs their moms the rest of the community deserves to
know. I didn't mention names or anything implying specific participants
to the outside.
> You have shown to be very attached to this topic, so much so that you've
> just blown this completely out of proportion. There was no "foul play"
> intended in that conservation
I was more or less told to fuck off if I don't like the tone.
This is where I left the channel.
How will I be able to tell women on LinuxTag 2010 that we do want women
in Gentoo with such tone in #gentoo-infra?