1 |
Jorge, |
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
On 06/19/10 05:20, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: |
5 |
> you're confusing talk and jokes between developers on a particular |
6 |
> private room with tone between members of the global community in public |
7 |
> mediums. |
8 |
|
9 |
It wasn't #gentoo-roughshit, it was in #gentoo-infra - the place devs go |
10 |
on infra matters. To the outside of Gentoo it may be a private channel, |
11 |
to Gentoo itself it is not (or should not be) a private channel. I can |
12 |
expect proper tone from an infra related channel just like from #gentoo-doc. |
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
> You're also missing an important point that some channels have their own |
16 |
> environment and so one should start by understanding it. Furthermore, |
17 |
> pushing for change and or imposing one's view on an established channel |
18 |
> is not a "nice" way to deal with the residents of that channel. |
19 |
> Another thing you've just done and should be aware of, is that you chose |
20 |
> to air into the public private conservations. When any Gentoo developer |
21 |
> decides to reveal a private discussion in the core ml or some other |
22 |
> private medium into the general public without the other parties |
23 |
> knowledge and or consent, that developer is abusing the other members' |
24 |
> "trust". |
25 |
|
26 |
If #gentoo-infra bangs their moms the rest of the community deserves to |
27 |
know. I didn't mention names or anything implying specific participants |
28 |
to the outside. |
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
> You have shown to be very attached to this topic, so much so that you've |
32 |
> just blown this completely out of proportion. There was no "foul play" |
33 |
> intended in that conservation |
34 |
|
35 |
I was more or less told to fuck off if I don't like the tone. |
36 |
This is where I left the channel. |
37 |
|
38 |
How will I be able to tell women on LinuxTag 2010 that we do want women |
39 |
in Gentoo with such tone in #gentoo-infra? |
40 |
|
41 |
Best, |
42 |
|
43 |
|
44 |
|
45 |
Sebastian |