Archives
Archives
| From: | Stroller <gentoogimp@×××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | veldy@×××××.net | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] ISC-Bind inconsistancy | ||
| Date: | Sun, 16 Mar 2003 19:48:55 | ||
| Message-Id: | 49254.192.168.1.70.1047844359.squirrel@gentoo.lan | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] ISC-Bind inconsistancy by "Thomas T. Veldhouse" |
||
| 1 | Thomas T. Veldhouse said: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | >>Whilst I can't comment on your other points, I supect that the short |
| 4 | >> answer |
| 5 | >> to this last is because "that's the way that Berkeley (?) package |
| 6 | > them'. |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > Uhm -- no they didn't. They are in the same source tarball. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Many apologies - my mistake. I was quite sure that was the case. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Stroller. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | -- |
| 17 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |