Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support

[Petteri Räty]

lxnay@××××××××××××.org wrote:
> So, "::" vs "@" apart, is it something that is worth looking and
> implementing in future EAPIs?
>

I don't see the main tree referring to other repositories any time soon
so this is not a pressing issue. But as said earlier this makes sense
for /etc/portage stuff so there going forward seems prudent. I suggest
using "::" as it's more established in these circles.

Regards,
Petteri