Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:12:32 +0200
Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> Hi! 
> 
> On Wed, 04 Nov 2009, Ryan Hill wrote:
>> Is there any interest in allowing certain packages to be stabilized by the
>> maintainer without going through the arch teams?  I always feel guilty when i
>> file stabilization bugs for app-doc pkgs.
> 
> I think for bugs which only install passive files (i.e. stuff
> that doesn't "power" anything else), Keywording can be done by the
> maintainer. Pure doc files (like selfhtml) are in that category.
> 

In the past when smaller arches were not that active we used to mark
Java packages stable after testing by at least one arch team. The
probability to find arch specific issues in something like Java is not
so high so I think arrangements like this are acceptable when the arch
teams have problems keeping up.

Regards,
Petteri

Attachment:
signature.asc (OpenPGP digital signature)
Replies:
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Tobias Klausmann
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Nirbheek Chauhan
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Joseph Jezak
References:
[RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Christian Faulhammer
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Markos Chandras
Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Christian Faulhammer
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Ben de Groot
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Joseph Jezak
Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Ryan Hill
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Tobias Klausmann
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
Next by thread:
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
Previous by date:
Re: Re: Lastrite (part 1): KDE3-only applications that won't build when KDE4 is installed
Next by date:
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations


Updated Nov 24, 2009

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.