Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfrever.fta@×××××.com>
To: Gentoo Development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 22:04:44
Message-Id: 200807270002.30342.Arfrever.FTA@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected by Gilles Dartiguelongue
1 2008-07-26 23:43:53 Gilles Dartiguelongue napisał(a):
2 > Le samedi 26 juillet 2008 à 21:39 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar
3 > Arahesis a écrit :
4 > > 2008-07-26 21:35:08 Donnie Berkholz napisał(a):
5 > > > On 18:37 Sat 26 Jul , Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
6 > > > > Mark Loeser (Halcy0n) (QA project leader) said on 2008-07-24 that this policy
7 > > > > doesn't exist. I understand that bug reports about LDFLAGS being ignored are
8 > > > > usually fixed, so I ask for the formal enacting of this policy.
9 > > >
10 > > > Why are you asking us? He's the QA lead, you should be talking with the
11 > > > QA team about this.
12 > >
13 > > Halcy0n said that this policy required prior discussion on this mailing list.
14 > >
15 >
16 > like Ciaran said, fixing packages ignoring LDFLAGS isn't going to be top
17 > priority
18
19 I never suggested that it should be top priority :).
20
21 > If making this a policy can make you happy, I see no problem with that.
22 > It won't make bugs fix themselves either way.
23
24 It will at least allow QA team to fix such bugs where patches are already
25 available.
26
27 --
28 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o>