Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
Subject: Re: ebuild laziness and binpkg overhead
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:10:20 -0400
On Friday 15 June 2012 03:44:14 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 06/13/2012 06:02 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > i've noticed a growing trend where people put setup of variables into
> > pkg_setup that only matter to src_* funcs presumably so they don't have
> > to call the respective src_* func from an inherited eclass. 
> > unfortunately this adds pointless overhead to binpkgs.  can we please
> > move away from this practice ?
> 
> Every Xfce ebuild in gentoo-x86 is using pkg_setup() for 3 variables,
> DOCS for src_install, PATCHES for src_prepare

these are static variables, so defining them in a func is pointless

> and XFCONF for src_configure

now you're down to one variable which means you've got one func to /properly/ 
define
-mike
Attachment:
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part.)
Replies:
Re: ebuild laziness and binpkg overhead
-- Samuli Suominen
References:
ebuild laziness and binpkg overhead
-- Mike Frysinger
Re: ebuild laziness and binpkg overhead
-- Samuli Suominen
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: ebuild laziness and binpkg overhead
Next by thread:
Re: ebuild laziness and binpkg overhead
Previous by date:
Re: RFC: esethome
Next by date:
Re: [PATCH] prune_libtool_files(): go into .a removal only when .a exists.


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.