Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] User-Submitted Ebuild Maintainer?
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 23:31:02
Message-Id: 200304240228.28562.danarmak@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] User-Submitted Ebuild Maintainer? by Evan Powers
1 On Thursday 24 April 2003 02:05, Evan Powers wrote:
2 > On Wednesday 23 April 2003 06:38 pm, Todd Berman wrote:
3 > > Is there someone in charge of looking at user-submitted ebuilds?
4 > ...
5 > > This seems like it might help get rid of part of the problem revolving
6 > > around ebuilds sitting in bugzilla and not being evaluated in any way.
7 >
8 > My understanding is that something like this is actually in the works.
9 >
10 > See Dan Armak's earlier post. { time="Tuesday 22 April 2003 10:26 am",
11 > subject="Re: [gentoo-dev] Ebuilds not getting in :(" }
12 >
13 > Maybe you saw that but didn't read as far into it as I did. Perhaps Dan can
14 > clarify?
15
16 What I said was:
17 <quote>
18 The points you and other people make in this thread are known and acknowledged
19 by us. We are busily working towards a setup that solves these problems. The
20 first step is the upcoming (I hope) reorganization of the gentoo internal
21 development model so that every ebuild has explicit maintainer(s). The second
22 will facilitate quick acceptance of user-submitted ebuilds in some way -
23 probably drawing upon the submitters in one way or another.
24
25 The implementation of this second step depends (imo) on the first, which is
26 being busily discussed for the past week. Please give us time to put it into
27 place before we move into the second phase, which is when user opinions/ideas
28 will be heard properly.
29 <unquote>
30
31 I hope the "first step" of setting up explicit maintainerships, as well as
32 reorganizing some other stuff, will begin to be implemented shortly (ie on a
33 scale of days or at most a week or two). The second step isn't anything I'm
34 involved in personally, rather people like George Shapovalov are. Anyway, it
35 has been discussed several times in the past, and there may have been
36 something like what you're suggesting - I'm no expert.
37
38 Reagrdless, your suggestion looks quite possibly workable to me. I'm going to
39 forward it to -core to make sure all developers see it and the right ones
40 respond.
41
42 About which - we're currently very busily discussing the -core vs. -dev issue
43 (numerous msgs per hour on several threads) and by the looks of it so far we
44 can probably expect a decision and some action RSN (tm).
45
46 --
47 Dan Armak
48 Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
49 Matan, Israel
50 Public GPG key: http://cvs.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] User-Submitted Ebuild Maintainer? Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] User-Submitted Ebuild Maintainer? George Shapovalov <george@g.o>