1 |
On Thursday 24 April 2003 02:05, Evan Powers wrote: |
2 |
> On Wednesday 23 April 2003 06:38 pm, Todd Berman wrote: |
3 |
> > Is there someone in charge of looking at user-submitted ebuilds? |
4 |
> ... |
5 |
> > This seems like it might help get rid of part of the problem revolving |
6 |
> > around ebuilds sitting in bugzilla and not being evaluated in any way. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> My understanding is that something like this is actually in the works. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> See Dan Armak's earlier post. { time="Tuesday 22 April 2003 10:26 am", |
11 |
> subject="Re: [gentoo-dev] Ebuilds not getting in :(" } |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Maybe you saw that but didn't read as far into it as I did. Perhaps Dan can |
14 |
> clarify? |
15 |
|
16 |
What I said was: |
17 |
<quote> |
18 |
The points you and other people make in this thread are known and acknowledged |
19 |
by us. We are busily working towards a setup that solves these problems. The |
20 |
first step is the upcoming (I hope) reorganization of the gentoo internal |
21 |
development model so that every ebuild has explicit maintainer(s). The second |
22 |
will facilitate quick acceptance of user-submitted ebuilds in some way - |
23 |
probably drawing upon the submitters in one way or another. |
24 |
|
25 |
The implementation of this second step depends (imo) on the first, which is |
26 |
being busily discussed for the past week. Please give us time to put it into |
27 |
place before we move into the second phase, which is when user opinions/ideas |
28 |
will be heard properly. |
29 |
<unquote> |
30 |
|
31 |
I hope the "first step" of setting up explicit maintainerships, as well as |
32 |
reorganizing some other stuff, will begin to be implemented shortly (ie on a |
33 |
scale of days or at most a week or two). The second step isn't anything I'm |
34 |
involved in personally, rather people like George Shapovalov are. Anyway, it |
35 |
has been discussed several times in the past, and there may have been |
36 |
something like what you're suggesting - I'm no expert. |
37 |
|
38 |
Reagrdless, your suggestion looks quite possibly workable to me. I'm going to |
39 |
forward it to -core to make sure all developers see it and the right ones |
40 |
respond. |
41 |
|
42 |
About which - we're currently very busily discussing the -core vs. -dev issue |
43 |
(numerous msgs per hour on several threads) and by the looks of it so far we |
44 |
can probably expect a decision and some action RSN (tm). |
45 |
|
46 |
-- |
47 |
Dan Armak |
48 |
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE) |
49 |
Matan, Israel |
50 |
Public GPG key: http://cvs.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key |