Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@...>
Subject: Re: Re: RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:40:13 +0100
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 03:28:48 -0700
Brian Harring <ferringb@...> wrote:
> Paludis wise, it's eapi2 indirictely due to boost and eselect.  
> Looking at the eapi depgraph for that, doesn't look particularly 
> viable for upgrading from a EAPI<2 manager for paludis.  I'll leave 
> it to Ciaran to comment on the feasability of a static rescue 
> binary (or extremely simplified upgrade pathway).

boost's just for Python bindings, which are optional. The eselect
dependency is hard, and can't easily be made optional, so ideally
eselect should stick with older EAPIs.

Maybe we should stick something in metadata.xml...

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh
Attachment:
signature.asc (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: Re: RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem
-- Ulrich Mueller
Re: Re: RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem
-- Brian Harring
References:
RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem
-- Alex Alexander
Re: RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem
-- Duncan
Re: Re: RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem
-- Rich Freeman
Re: Re: RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem
-- Brian Harring
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem
Next by thread:
Re: Re: RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem
Previous by date:
Re: Re: RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem
Next by date:
Re: Re: RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes | a solution for GLEP 55's problem


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.